Blogging Social Difference: Week 9

For Thanksgiving, I went to my grandparents' house in Diamond Bar, CA, which is on the eastern edge of Los Angeles County. They moved to Diamond Bar in the late 1960s. My grandpa tells me how many fewer houses there were at the time. He talks about the hills and how empty they used to be, compared to now when they are covered in tract houses. Their neighborhood is full of suburban houses that you might picture from the 1960s or 70s - generally ranch style homes. I suppose that as the desire to live in the suburbs grew, so did the number of houses and their concentration in the area.



At dinner my grandma (who is fairly conservative and was raised on a farm) mentioned how "we" are the minority now. What she was referring to is the ratio of Asian Americans to white Americans in Diamond Bar. And it's true. The population of the city is now overwhlemingly Asain. According to city-data.com, the city is 52% Asian and only 21.3% white. That site also says that the average median household income is $88,598, which is pretty far above the average for the state of California. This tells us that when looking at the axes of difference we talked about in lecture, we really do have to separate race from class. Diamond Bar is a perfect case of this. Clearly, people are well-off here and it's majority population is considered a minority on a national level.

I think the fact that my grandma brought this up shows that she's from a different time. Growing up, she was in a place where whites were a majority and minority populations were usually synonymous with a lower class. It's probably a little strange for white people of her generation who grew up in the U.S. to see the racial dynamics of their communities shift, even though they (or they're parents or grandparents) likely immigrated to America, too.

Blogging Social Difference: Week 8

This week I visited the city of Irvine in Orange County. I did a little research about the demographics of the city. On the city's website, I learned that about 80% of the population is split between whites and Asians, and that the Asian population in Irvine has been growing faster than the total population. In thinking about social difference and Irvine, I find that there is a general trend toward an increase in the ratio of Asians to other ethnicities and furthermore an increase in the influence of various Asian cultures in Irvine.

In many other cities, a socioeconomic trend usually coincides with the ethnic breakdown and where certain groups live. However, I created some maps on simplymaps.com and found that, while some neighborhoods had higher ratios of one ethnicity to another, the city is pretty ethnically diverse without very concentrated areas or neighborhoods. I think this can be attributed to the fact that Irvine is a very wealthy and economically successful city overall. As Map 1 indicates, throughout most of Irvine the unemployment rate is below 5.88% and the national average (as of July, 2012) is 7.9%! This is a place that many highly-skilled people come to find jobs; and apparently they do. Map 2 shows the average household income in Irvine. There are only a handful of neighborhoods in Irvine where the average household income is below $62,965. The average household income for the whole United States is $51,914! The fact that far more than half of this city has an average household income of $93,522 demonstrates my observation that Irvine is quite wealthy overall. 

Map 1

Map 2

I think it's interesting that most large cities have a trend of ethnically concentrated neighborhoods and generally seem to follow the stereotype that certain groups make significantly less in income than others. In Irvine, every group has an average higher than the national average, and usually by quite a bit. What does this say about a city that was built with a mission like Irvine's? In an introduction to the City of Irvine's General Plan, I found this: 

"Using the City’s Strategic Business Plan and the General Plan, the Irvine City Council makes decisions, based on fiscal limitations, that will: maintain and enhance Irvine’s physical environment that will prevent community deterioration; secure a safe community by assuring the right balance between public safety services and prevention strategies; encourage economic prosperity by attracting and retaining businesses and sales tax; and promote effective government by assuring that the City organization is flexible, market-based and customer focused in its service delivery."

            This statement seems to focus on how the city can attract businesses, be savvy with city money, and, by extension, attract the "types" of people that fit this mold (i.e. wealthy and/or highly skilled people). And this is very much what it feels like there. Not only are there large buildings and stylish industrial parks, but there are also very clean, and even extravagant, suburban communities which clearly house many wealthy families. I think that social difference in Irvine doesn't follow the trends of many other large cities. I think that Irvine is socially different from many other cities in the Los Angeles region in that its average household income and unemployment rates are different. In Irvine, many of the stereotypical racial or ethnic trends are not the same. When I was there, I didn't see any bums on the street like I would in Westwood (or almost anywhere else for that matter). I think in Irvine, social difference mostly comes from the ethnic and cultural facets. There just aren't the same class-based differences as in other cities.

Blogging Social Difference: Week 7

This is my response to Sasha's blog post about a coffee shop in South Pasadena.

Amanda YoungNovember 16, 2012 9:52 PM

This is a really interesting way to think about a coffee shop. I feel like there are two kinds of coffee shops: the ones that people go to for a quick pick-me-up and WiFi, and the ones where people go to socialize and meet new people. I like how you brought in the idea of Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft. A coffee shop where there is an array of customers that probably each have a unique background, yet are happy to converse with each other whether or not they know each other definitely brings to mind ideas of Gemeinschaft. Any town or neighborhood with a small-town feel where everyone seems to know each other and is super friendly is the kind of place where community matters, and social differences between people seem not to matter. And when community matters to people, they tend to participate and volunteer their time in order to preserve that feeling of community. On the other had, in a dense, busy city, Gesellschaft tends to take over. There are so many strangers and people are constantly in such a hurry that they don't really stop to consider anyone else. They run into the coffee shop, order, and leave. (I think this speaks to your comment about the traffic as well. LA has a public transportation system and carpool lanes, yet somehow it never pops into my mind as an ideal or preferred means of travel. I think people are so busy and involved in so many individual activities that they always need to be somewhere; hence the constant traffic.) And those that stay are usually on their laptops or listening to music instead of being open to encounters with others. I think that our society isn't completely Gemeinschaft or Gesellschaft. I think that we have a mix of both; and I think that each has pros and cons. Whether or not it's a good thing is up to each individual, and places are so diverse that I think there's a place for everyone.

Blogging Social Difference: Week 6

Amanda YoungNovember 10, 2012 10:09 PM

I think this post is really insightful. I never really gave a second thought as to why Bel Air neighborhoods have no sidewalks. The lack of a space for pedestrians blocks social access to this area for a lot of people. Having a gated "entrance" to Bel Air right across the street from the UCLA dorms blocks social access to all the students that go for a run around the area. Furthermore, having no sidewalks implies that the people who are socially welcomed there have to own a car (which means they also have to be able to afford the lifestyle that comes with owning a car).

Also, I like how you applied Park's statement to houses in a community. It makes me think of the street I grew up on and how my friends and I would walk down the street (on the sidewalk) to each other's houses, ride our bikes in the street, and other things like that. There's no way that a community like Bel Air is welcoming to that kind of activity. It's interesting how something as simple as sidewalks can play such a large role in having a sense of community in a neighborhood. I wonder if that was an outcome that the people who first started building in Bel Air considered? Maybe privacy is a reason that people choose to live there?

I like the way you connected Bel Air with Orange County as well. I took the Metropolitan LA class in Spring and there we discussed how and why Orange County developed. Originally, it was sort of an extension to Los Angeles. A lot of business moved down there, and slowly suburbs began to emerge from there. The highway system that connects the city of Los Angeles with the rest of the metropolitan area reinforces the impact and even necessity of the automobile on Southern California life.

Michelle's blog: http://perpetualmotionmichelle.blogspot.com/2012/10/blogging-social-difference-in-la-week-3.html?showComment=1352614189408#c6135729163943965823

Blogging Social Difference: Week 5

This week, I visited my hometown of Redlands, CA  Redlands is about eighty miles away from Los Angeles, but is connected by the stretch of industrial and suburban areas that spread out from LA via the freeways. In the article, “The Emergence of Postsuburbia,” Olin, Kling, and Poster write that “since World War II, North American suburbs have become socially varied because they increasingly house the working class as well as the middle class, racial minorities as well as whites, and single people as well as traditional families. But they are still characterized by a land-use pattern that is dominantly residential and a transportation pattern that is dominantly one in which people commute to work outside the area.” This description of a typical suburb of today also happens to exactly describe Redlands.

In Redlands, there is a very popular (and quite large) outdoor shopping center called Citrus Plaza. Olin, Kling, and Poster would call it a “regional [center] anchored by several large department stores” (such as Target, Kohl’s, and JC Penney) that was “designed for efficient shopping.” An interesting thing to note is that Citrus Plaza sort of a place with restricted social access on the basis of class. When compared to other shopping centers, the people who shop at Citrus Plaza are middle-class, mostly white, and often with all or part of their families. The architecture and design of the center attract these people. Citrus Plaza is a shopping center that is commonly a place where people shop for items that aren't necessities (like groceries would be). My friends and I even go there just to hang out and walk around sometimes. Overall, it has a "going out" kind of atmosphere while also allowing us to feel close to home.